that was showing to me before I even logged into the board - FYI
probably shouldn't be a public board...
Looking forward
Moderator: Akira
- Baron[CotC]
- Caesar
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 1:29 am
- Xfire Username: redbaroncotc
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
I like the name!!!!!!!!BD wrote:Take a look.warf wrote: Maybe we should have a politicl/religion/conspiracy forum section that is non-public, and check your ego at the door.
North Carolina Sunday Hunting: http://www.ncdeer.net
Can't you feel our souls ignite
Shedding ever changing colours,
in the darkness of the fading night,
Like the river joins the ocean,
as the germ in a seed grows
We have finally been freed to get back home.
Can't you feel our souls ignite
Shedding ever changing colours,
in the darkness of the fading night,
Like the river joins the ocean,
as the germ in a seed grows
We have finally been freed to get back home.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 11:03 pm
I agree. Just a quick reading of the archives shows that some of the most innocent of posts start huge flames. And some of the posts are not so innocent.D.A.R.K.[CotC] wrote:To Nemesis:
I think this thread is actually a bit different from your normal "political issue" because instead of throwing out our oppinions at each other, we are instead informing each other of our future possible options for president in 2 years. Speculation is not the same as debating and flaming.
Where I draw the line at "flame" might not be your line. Or Dataspel's. Or ADC's. Someone's "robust disagreement" might be someone else's "complete disrespect."
My preference is to err on the side of caution, I guess. In this case because there are so many other places to "speculate" about political issues. But there are damn few places to talk rationally about camping in FPS games.
IMO, of course.