Page 1 of 1

H&K VS Colt in underwater test

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 1:49 pm
by warf

Re: H&K VS Colt in underwater test

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 8:12 pm
by Ender[CotC]
wow... just, wow.

Re: H&K VS Colt in underwater test

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:35 am
by BD
Too bad HK doesn't give handy's to our congressmen or we'd get those instead of the crappy colts. Not that there's anything wrong with the crappy colts if you are in optimal firing conditions with a brand new one. Having had the opportunity to qualify with a G3 with the German Army... I would _always_ take an HK sight unseen over anything the US Harmme wanted to issue me.

This one is still my favorite, ugly as sin but sexy as hell in a german BDSM weaponry kind of way.
(totally safe for the work and fam) http://www.youtube.com/v/MdErfyYeJeU&hl=en

With the M/16 M/4 you really have two firing option, safe and semi (single shot). If you get one that's full auto, your 4 seconds to empty the clip guarantees you won't hit shit. A three round burst means the first round is hitting their body armor dead center, the second shot is whizzing past their ear and the third is hitting a UAV a mile away. The recoil is nothing remarkable but in a burst, it usually renders you 66% ineffective from anything past a prone-supported position.
Image
The G11 removes the recoil from the equation. freaking sweet!